Standards. Objectives. Outcomes. These are just a few of the words consistently used in official teacher evaluations by administrators. Oftentimes an administrator simply checks items off a list when observing teachers instead of focusing on the entire experience of his or her teaching. This has led to a consistent effort by lawmakers to begin to incorporate more data-driven items on that checklist, including student test scores. To many educators, including Diane Ravitch, there is enough evidence to prove this approach will lead to more test-prep and less actual understanding in our students.

So, I would like to point out a model being used in schools across Montgomery County, MD that is having some success. A recent NY Times article explains how they use both teachers and principals in a process they call Peer Assistance Review (PAR). From the brief description it seems like true collaboration between educators and administrators to seek and assist struggling teachers before removing them from the teaching profession. Since half of all teachers leave before their 5th year, this seems like a great idea to maintain and support the next generation of adults at the front of the classroom.

Essentially, inexperienced educators are mentored by their veteran peers over the course of many months. If their teaching does not improve then they are placed in front of a peer review panel which has the power to demand changes, including the teacher losing his or her job. The amazing part about this panel is that half are teachers and half are principals and yet their comments are quite consistent.

I am truly confused why models like this don't exist on a massive scale across the country already. Professional journals have a peer review process before allowing any research to appear in them; why shouldn't professionals who work with kids get the same treatment with evaluations of their work? 

Over the past few weeks I have been toying with creating a terminology for what could describe my ideal setting in education. At the moment I am focused on a few buzz-words: collaborative, community-driven, and transparent. I believe in a system that fosters these ideals and think it would create such an amazing environment that people of all differing interests would flock to education instead of fleeing from it right after their student loans are paid off at 5 years.
 


Comments

Alon
06/16/2011 10:23

Hey Brian, it seems like one reason PAR is not implemented all across the country is that it needs to start from the bottom-up, through trust between principals, teachers, and administrators.

It's also interesting to note that 40 times as many teachers were fired AFTER PAR than before (200 vs. 5)! And 300 teachers left rather than be evaluated by PAR. Do you think the district is adding teachers back at that rate? They need to attract more high quality teachers through incentives, but one incentive could be the freedom from being evaluated by test scores!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply