A good friend and fellow teacher suggested recently that I start a Book Club of sorts through this blog. Well, I've finally decided to bite the bullet and share with you the next book I plan to read: How Children Succeed by Paul Tough. If you want to read it by the end of February and comment on my next "Book Review" blog post, then spend the next four weeks paging through. It's not long but is sure to be a good read. 
Picture
In the meantime, I've spent the last few weeks reading Value-Added Measure in Education by Douglas Harris. He spends 230 pages explaining the history and application of value-added measures (VAM) as they relate to education. A lot of the beginning of the book is spent describing the different types of assessment that exists (even in the VAM realm) and how they all have positives and negatives depending on how the measures are used. 

The entire book is quite well written and contains a lot of arguments either way in the use of VAM. One major thing he notes as a barrier to widespread use of the system is the fact that there are large margins of error when applying VAM to specific teachers. When New York City released the VAM scores of 18,000 teachers, the confidence intervals were 35 and 53 percent for Math and English respectively - quite a wide margin. 

Picture
The chart shown here was created by Harris in order to compare teachers in different schools as well as the schools themselves. It is easy to notice that when the schools are used as the item of measurement the variance is much lower than when the teachers are used.

The other major issue to consider with this chart is that even though the teachers were different scores overall, the confidence intervals demonstrate that there was almost no true way of knowing which teacher was better than the other because of the overlap. 

At the end of the book Harris makes 10 "recommendations for creating and reporting value-added measures for accountability purposes." His first recommendation is unsurprising to educators: make better tests. For years we have been noticing the decline in emphasis on critical thinking and problem-solving due to the overuse of multiple-choice questions and specific content areas (Math and English) being emphasized. He suggests that tests across the country model themselves on the International Baccalaureate (IB) exams because it is "an authentic assessment, meaning that it captures skills like inquiry and problem solving" (p. 202). He understands this will cost more money and require more time due to the increase in open-ended questions used, but recognizes that it will overall benefit our children.

This book explores the complexities of Value-Added Measurement well and is fairly balanced on the subject. I am sure there are those who would disagree with me so I hope they comment here.

 


Comments

02/07/2013 10:31

If I had a billion dollars--or more likely several billion dollars--I would create a national assessment system modeled after IB and AP. We already know that it works...

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply