"School District possesses full authority to act unilaterally with respect to any matter not expressly set forth in this Agreement."
That is how the document outlining the new potential collective bargaining agreement begins. You can view the rest of it by clicking here. This ridiculous proposal aims at demotivating and deconstructing the already-beaten profession of teaching. If these policies were put into place not only would I be forced to resign my position in protest but plenty of other teachers would as well. 

Perhaps a few quick highlights will be illuminating:

• All salaries will be reduced, with those making the most money to be losing 13% of what they earn. I imagine a wave of retirements and resignings from the veteran cohort of teachers. Say what you will about the stereotypical image of the old-school teacher not doing a good job - but know that the majority of them are good teachers and would continue for years unless this kind of things takes hold.

• Increase in time for school day from 7 hours, 4 minutes to 8 hours. While I understand the desire to increase the number of minutes in high-quality learning environments, the people who are crafting these policies seem unaware of modern biology and psychology. People can only focus for a certain amount of time and after that there is diminishing marginal utility. 

• Increase teaching load to six classes per day (from five). As teachers (and friends/family thereof) know, class sizes have ballooned to such a number that each teacher easily sees 150-160 students per day. If another classes were added on top of that, we would be pushing 180 per teacher. If any assignment were given more than 1 minute of time for assessment, that would be 3 hours of work! How could any teacher give reasonable feedback with that load? Answer: they couldn't.

• Elimination of copy machines and textbooks. Not only are teachers supposed to teach 180 students per day, but they are also supposed to do it without resources. It is easy to save money by not providing paper or machinery to copy. It is also easy to eliminate learning by not actually teaching.

If the District is serious about retaining or - more importantly - enticing new teachers to work, they will reconsider this proposal. Otherwise I would be happy to join my compatriots on the picket line.
 


Comments

02/27/2013 09:48

Thanks for opening the dialogue.

Teachers did not cause the fiscal crises. Over 10 years of under-funding Philadelphia schools has done that. While SDP spends about $13,000 per student, our friends in Lower Merion can provide about $26,000. And at Episcopal Academy, upper school tuition is about $30,000. What's good enough for Pennsylvania's wealthier families should be good enough for Philadelphia's families.

If per-pupil spending has little impact on student learning, then why does Lower Merion spend so much?

And can we look at the degree to which students arrive at school ready to learn. Does a student's proximity to poverty -- or wealth -- affect their learning readiness?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply